Sofia Shapatava vs Julie Struplova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve effectiveness: Julie Struplova has recently secured 38.92% of points on her second serve, slightly behind Sofia Shapatava's 39.96%. Could this small difference impact the match outcome? Perhaps, as there is a strong linkage between this stat and predicting match winners.
• Return performance: Struplova outperforms Shapatava in returning serves, claiming 52.61% of her opponent's second serve points compared to Shapatava's 50.11%, and excelling further on first serves with 39.73% versus Shapatava's 31.30%.
• Breakpoint resilience: Are both players equally resilient under pressure? Close maybe, as Struplova saves breakpoints at 51.05%, and Shapatava improves slightly with 51.58%.
• Match wins: Over the past year, Struplova wins 75% of her matches, overshadowing Shapatava's 60.87% success rate.
• Surface preference: Clay seems favorable for Struplova with a 70% win rate, while Shapatava excels on grass with the same win percentage of 70%.
• Match levels: Struplova mainly competes in Challengers/ITF events above $10K and boasts a solid 72.55% win rate, compared to Shapatava's 66% at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K.
• Opponent quality: Struplova's rivals had an average ranking of 426.16, higher than Shapatava's average competition rank of 390.61.
• Deciding set outcomes: In pressure moments, Struplova emerges victorious in 79% of deciding sets, surpassing Shapatava's 67% success rate.
• Breakpoint conversion: Shapatava leads in this area, converting 41.59% of her opportunities, while Struplova follows closely at 39.74%.

Editorial Prediction (November 30, 2025, UTC):

As Julie Struplova and Sofia Shapatava prepare to face off, a number of factors could sway the match outcome. Struplova demonstrates superior return game abilities and excels in high-pressure deciding sets. These strengths might give her a crucial competitive edge.

Conversely, Shapatava's marginally better second serve performance, along with higher breakpoint conversion, may help her in crucial game situations. Despite these advantages, her overall match win rate trails behind that of Struplova.

Considering these aspects, while both players have distinct strengths, Julie Struplova seems likely to clinch victory based on her consistent performance across various metrics and greater win consistency under pressure.